“Apple can’t just shove this horrible phone scan plan to the side in order to avoid bad press during its Apple Event”
What you need to know
Protests have taken place at some Apple Stores in the U.S.
A group called ‘Fight For The Future’ is demanding Apple drop plans to scan iCloud Photos for Child Sexual Abuse Material.
The group claims the measures could leave to “unprecedented surveillance”.
A series of small protests have taken place at some Apple stores in the U.S. ahead of the iPhone 13 launch over Apple’s Child Safety Measures that include scanning iCloud Photos for images of Child Sexual Abuse Material.
The protests, organised by Fight For the Future, were organized for stores in NYC, San Francisco, Boston, Atlanta, Portland, OR, and Washington D.C.
In a press release Fight For the Future stated “the protests are demanding that Apple permanently shelve their dangerous proposal to install photo and message scanning malware on millions of people’s devices. The company already announced it was delaying the misguided proposal after widespread backlash from security experts and human rights experts. Protesters are calling on them to publicly commit to never implementing it.”
The group’s campaign director Caitlin Seeley George stated that Apple couldn’t just “shove this horrible phone scan plan to the side” so as to avoid bad press during its Apple event, where the company is expected to unveil a new iPhone, Apple Watch Series 7, and AirPods 3. Whilst Apple’s CSAM scanning plans have been met with pushback, forcing the company to put the measures on hold, FFTF’s protests appear to have been sparsely attended, official photos show groups of no more than nine people and multiple stores appear to have been visited by just one or two people.
Apple’s software chief Craig Federighi has admitted in an interview that the company’s plans have been “widely misunderstood” and that in hindsight the company should not have announced CSAM scanning and a new Communication Safety feature, that uses machine learning to scan messages sent to children, at the same time, stating it was “a recipe for this kind of confusion.”